Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles (2024)

MATTHEW BROWN

Updated ·4 min read

Wildlife agencies are trying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado's ambitious wolf reintroduction program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the voter-driven initiative.

The move comes only a week after state officials touted three pups born to the Copper Creek pack, which formed after 10 of the predators from Oregon were released in December over bitter opposition from livestock groups. The pack has at least two adults.

The bid to capture them goes against Colorado's wolf management plan that was adopted last year. It included guidance that relocation “has little technical merit” because it could create problems elsewhere if the animals continue attacking livestock. The plan calls for using non-lethal approaches, such as patrolling ranches with range riders and scaring away problem wolves, or killing them if necessary to stop ongoing attacks on livestock.

Officials did not say where the Copper Creek pack would be relocated, nor whether they would be released into the wild or kept in captivity.

Ranching groups had wanted the wolf pack killed. Wildlife advocates said more should have been done to keep them from killing livestock, such as using electric fencing that can better deters attacks.

In other parts of the U.S. where wolves are well-established — including in the Northern U.S. Rocky Mountains and around the Great Lakes — the predators are routinely killed by wildlife officials in response to livestock attacks. Wolves are prolific breeders so removing some animals doesn't have population-wide effects.

Colorado's attempt to instead capture problem wolves comes after an agency spokesperson told The Associated Press last week that officials wanted to avoid killing them because “it's too early in the process” of reintroduction.

“We don't have enough wolves on the landscape to lethally remove” the pack, spokesperson Travis Duncan said.

State officials did not disclose where the capture operations were taking place but said the work was being done with help from federal officials and under U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rules. More details will be released after the relocation is completed, Duncan said Wednesday.

Michael Saul with Defenders of Wildlife said it was a “big setback” for the reintroduction.

“There are lots of ranchers using existing tools who are living with wolves and not having this problem,” Saul said. “Even if the individual wolves survived, taking them out of the wild is removing the one successful breeding pack for Colorado.”

Saul said he was concerned the pups might not survive the capture operations and that the two adult wolves might not be released. That would be contrary to the voter-approved plan to reintroduce the animals to the wild, he said.

Rancher Ted Ritschard, who lives about 15 miles (24 kilometers) from the ranch in Grand County, Colorado, where most of the livestock attacks took place, said he was glad the pack would be removed. He blamed them for killing at least 16 cattle and sheep and wants them in captivity so they don't kill again.

“These pups have learned to kill livestock so they're going to keep doing it,” said Ritschard, president of the Middle Park Stockgrowers Association. “Once they get a taste of sheep or cattle, that’s a whole different world."

Ritschard said area ranchers sought permission earlier this year to kill the wolves that were causing problems but were denied. The state's denial notice said livestock attacks had decreased when a rancher in the area buried a “dead pit” used to dispose of dead animals that was suspected of attracting wolves.

Ritschard refuted the claim that the dead pit played a role in the attacks.

“We would see the wolves go by that dead pit at night. There was nothing fresh in that dead pit,” he said.

In a statement issued late Tuesday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis characterized the Copper Creek pack relocation as a “unique case,” but did not elaborate.

“This action is by no means a precedent for how CPW will resolve wolf-livestock conflict moving forward,” Davis said in the statement. He said the goal was to relocate the pack “while we assess our best options for them.”

Wolf reintroduction in Colorado was narrowly approved by voters in a 2020 ballot measure. Wildlife officials expect to release an additional 30 to 50 wolves over the coming years. A handful of wolves have also wandered into Colorado from Wyoming.

Proponents argued that the apex predators would reestablish an ecological balance in the area. Wolves were largely hunted out of the state by the 1940s.

Owners of calves that are killed can be compensated by the state for the animal’s market value, up to $15,000. Ranchers have said that's not enough.

Gray wolves killed some 800 domesticated animals across 10 states in 2022, including Colorado, according to a previous Associated Press review of depredation data from state and federal agencies.

While the losses can affect individual ranchers, it has a negligible effect on the industry at large. Ranchers say many additional kills go unrecorded because the dead livestock is never found or the cause of death can’t be confirmed.

Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles (2024)

FAQs

Wolf pack that attacked Colorado livestock to be relocated as reintroduction program stumbles? ›

Wildlife agencies are trying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado's ambitious wolf reintroduction

wolf reintroduction
Wolf reintroduction involves the reintroduction of a portion of grey wolves in areas where native wolves have been extirpated. More than 30 subspecies of Canis lupus have been recognized, and grey wolves, as colloquially understood, comprise nondomestic/feral subspecies.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Wolf_reintroduction
program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the voter-driven initiative.

Why is it bad to reintroduce wolves to Colorado? ›

Scientists there fear a Colorado gray wolf introduction “threatens the genetic integrity and recovery of the subspecies.” Translation: the genetic extinction of the Mexican wolf is a very real possibility.

What is the wolf reintroduction program trying to accomplish? ›

Since 1995, when wolves were reintroduced to the American West, research has shown that in many places they have helped revitalize and restore ecosystems. They improve habitat and increase populations of countless species from birds of prey to pronghorn, and even trout.

When did they reintroduce wolves to Colorado? ›

Wolves in Colorado

Ten wolves were reintroduced to the state in December, 2023 as part of this plan.

What is the controversy with the wolves released in Colorado? ›

Some Coloradans feel that the decision to reintroduce wolves was formed into a political one, when it should have been left up to experts in CPW or the communities most affected by the reintroduction.

Is reintroducing wolves bad? ›

Perceived positive impacts of wolf reintroduction mentioned by 2019 survey respondents include the ability of wolves to restore balance to ecosystems and improve the natural environment; the opportunity to view wolves in the wild; emotional and cultural connections to wolves; enhanced tourism opportunities; a reduction ...

Do we really need wolves? ›

While they may affect abundance in some species, wolves can also play an important role in the environment. In ungulate herds that have not been exposed to wolves for a time, this can increase the proportion of healthy animals of prime age, leading to higher pregnancy and birth rates.

Can ranchers shoot wolves in Colorado? ›

— Colorado has had gray wolves for six months, and ranchers have been living in a gray area. It is legal in Colorado for someone to kill a wolf, if they see it in the act of killing their livestock, but it is illegal in Colorado to hunt with night-vision equipment.

Are there grey wolves in Colorado? ›

The gray wolf is native to Colorado. Historically, wolves were distributed in Colorado throughout all major habitat types. During the latter half of the 1800s, hunters decimated wolf prey such as bison, elk, and deer.

What states are reintroducing wolves? ›

Recovering populations exist in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Washington and Oregon, with a few wolves beginning to range into California.

Why is the wolf reintroduction project so controversial in the Rockies? ›

The reintroduction has been lauded by conservationists but criticized by ranchers and people in rural communities, who say the wolves pose a risk to livestock, wildlife and pets.

Why do ranchers oppose the reintroduction of wolves? ›

The ranchers are again worried about the safety of their livestock with such a major predator roaming free in the area. The loss of cattle or sheep may not only cause financial hardship, but also an emotional loss. Before re-introduction ranchers around Yellowstone felt that any losses of cattle were unacceptable.

Are the Colorado wolves being tracked? ›

Tracking Wolves

All released wolves will be monitored using satellite GPS collars, which will inform managers on survival and dispersal, as well as future release protocols.

What is a disadvantage of reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone? ›

One potential disadvantage of reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone is an increase in livestock depredation. Wolves, being keystone species, play a pivotal role in their ecosystem and their presence can lead to significant ecological changes.

Was it a good idea to reintroduce wolves to Yellowstone? ›

The Effects of the Reintroduction of Wolves

In the years that followed, wolves brought the elk population down and protected the open valleys from overgrazing.

Why do people oppose wolf reintroduction? ›

Ranchers and hunters frequently oppose wolf reintroduction initiatives because they are worried about wolves preying on their cattle and game animals.

Why were the coyotes negatively affected when the wolves were reintroduced? ›

There appears to be a trade-off in which wolf kills provide a quick source of food that is energetically advantageous to coyotes; however, attendant costs included increased vigilance, decreased rest, and a higher risk of being killed.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

Last Updated:

Views: 5251

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

Phone: +50616620367928

Job: Real-Estate Liaison

Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.